Many are celebrating Halloween this week, but we like to remember the more ancient meanings of this holiday. At the Atlantic Institute, we honor those who came before us with knowledge of the cycles of the year.
November 1 marks the halfway point between the Fall Equinox and the Winter Solstice. It is when we descend into the darkest time of the year. Plants start to slow their growth and shed their leaves, preparing their seeds to lie fallow for the winter. What that means is that it is time for quiet reflection and going inward. One may start to look back on the activities of the past year and decide how to best move forward once the light starts to return in a few months.
In this modern world, we don’t necessarily have to follow these patterns like our ancestors. But for most of us, the holiday season keeps us so busy that we have to hold off on many of our projects.
Just like you, we are taking the next few months to make plans for the springtime. We’re thrilled to see the growth of our staff-family, helping to create even better ways to teach you the intuitive science of healing with essential oils.
As Sylla moves closer to retirement and Nyssa continues to build this incredible program her mother created, we are looking for serious students that may one day like to become aromatherapy educators, too.
Read about what it takes to teach aromatherapy and why we need more of you!
We encourage you to reflect on what your heart needs to blossom … Remember that the greatest gift you can give the world is your own self-healing. Let us know how we can help.
I was recently accused of spreading around “quackery.”
It’s not the first time, and it probably won’t be the last. Occasionally, there are people who undercut the research I’ve done along with the chemists and scientists I’ve worked with. They say, “You believe in alternative medicine? You must be a quack.” Unfortunately, it’s part of the package when you’re dealing with a relatively new and unregulated health industry. Thankfully, it doesn’t ruffle my feathers so much anymore.
However, this particular critic accused me of something much worse: promoting essential oils as a cure-all for cancer.
It’s true that I wrote a blog post on how essential oils helped me through one of the most trying times in my life—when I was diagnosed with Stage 1, non-aggressive breast cancer. But I never said that essential oils are a cure for cancer. In fact, I continually promote the idea of using essential oils as complementary treatment alongside conventional treatment. I myself underwent a lumpectomy and radiation treatment. I used essential oils to mitigate scarring, improve my mood, and help ease the tenderness of my irradiated skin—all of which were the focus of that post.
Unfortunately, it seems my critic didn’t read the full blog post before taking her stance against me. I respect her eagerness to protect cancer patients from unhelpful and dangerous “cure-all” treatments. I’ve been in a similar battle of my own, trying to make sure essential oils are used safely and responsibly. This is a good reminder that we must always search for the truth, and not simply make assumptions based on our opinions and beliefs.
It’s not quackery. It’s real science.
As for the wider accusation of promoting “quackery” in general, I think this is a good time to explain that it’s not quackery. It’s real science, which I’ve had the pleasure of studying for 40 years and counting. For those of you interested in where I’ve studied and who I’ve studied with, see my Vintage Aromatherapist blog. You can also find a list of my aromatherapy accomplishments here. I’m always striving to accomplish more, but I think my achievements aren’t too shabby thus far!
During those 40 years, I worked with well-known and respected minds, including Martin Watt, Dr. Trevor Stokes, Dr. Robert Pappas, and Tony Burfield—to name a few. I wrote many papers and presentations, along with the personal blog mentioned above. I also wrote all of the courses, books, and classes we offer today. You can find my bio here.
I’m very passionate about illuminating the exciting and surprising truths of aromatherapy and essential oils, and about offering my hard-earned knowledge to my students.
So to those critics, I have one thing to say: it’s not quackery, it’s chemistry!
Recently, the aromatherapy world has begun discussing the truth behind the so-called “French,” “German,” and “English” aromatherapy “schools,” as if they actually existed.
I am thrilled to see this topic come up because the idea of these “schools” has baffled me for some time now. I would definitely advise reading Gabriel Mojay’s open letter to me on this subject here. He says, “In a nutshell: the so-called ‘French’ and ‘British’ labels are being used to mislead and mystify.”
In reality, depending on the need, there are only three methods of essential oils use: topical, oral, and inhalation (or external, internal, and environmental). Although, as Gabriel points out, the integrated therapeutic discipline of Aromatherapy should combine these methods. The different “schools” get the methods of aromatherapy correct, but that’s about the extent of their accuracy.
So where do these “schools” come from? To explain, I’ll need to dive back into the history of aromatherapy.
Around 1910, a Frenchman named R.M. Gattefossé burned his hands badly and contracted gas gangrene, which he successfully treated with Lavender essential oil. Afterwards, he coined the term “aromatherapy.” He was not the first researcher to write about this form of therapy, but he was the first to recognize the therapeutic use of essential oils as a discipline in itself (more on Gattefossé here).
Later, Dr. Jean Valnet coined the term “aromatic medicine.” He was also French (you can find his literature here and a brief biography here). Dr. Valnet has been made into the face of oral and undiluted use of essential oils. However, his research was much more widespread and focused on aromatherapy and essential oils as treatments for illnesses.
Nowadays, Gattefossé is hailed by many as the “father of aromatherapy.” He has been grouped together with Valnet, thus building the idea of a French “school” that supports widespread essential oil ingestion.
The French “school”
As medicinal aromatherapy took root, it began to engage pharmacists and physicians all over Europe; however, many were in France. In 1978, Dr. Paul Belaiche published a study on the clinical use of essential oils in the treatment of infectious and degenerative diseases (more information on Belaiche here). Jean-Claude Lapraz, Christian Duraffourd, and Dominique Baudoux have all contributed enormously to the understanding of the medical activity of essential oils as well.
In 1980, French chemist Henri Viaud published a study on the purity and quality criteria that essential oils have to meet in order to be suitable for medical purposes. Then, in the 1990s, Dr. Daniel Pénoël and Pierre Franchomme provided the medical aroma text of the decade. Today, we have the Endobiogeny sector with Doctors Lapraz and Duraffourd for that purpose (learn more about that here).
The contributions of these French and Belgian doctors and pharmacists have greatly added to the understanding of how to incorporate essential oils into medical treatments. This has become known as the “French method.”
The British “school”
Meanwhile, I’ve seen Marguerite Maury associated with the British School, though she was Austrian-born and studied in France. Maury did train beauty and massage therapists in London, but she also trained therapists all over Europe. She was Valnet’s student, too, though she had different goals for aromatherapy and a different perspective. She wasn’t aiming to medicate people in the way Valnet and his fellows were. However, her teachings were just as valid and are most often used in conjunction with other forms of aromatherapy. (See more on her here).
The separation of aromatherapy methods into “schools” really began in the early 2000s when one of Dr. Daniel Pénoël’s lectures included a joke that became truth.
Dr. Pénoël, whose speaking style is very charismatic and humorous, described the differences between the three schools in this way:
“The German system of aromatherapy (smell) is comparable to platonic love. You cannot make babies with platonic love. The English system is like flirting. You still cannot make babies. The French system of aromatherapy is like ‘The Full Monty,’ and it will make babies!”
So, although Dr. Pénoël’s statement had a joking quality to it, it was taken very much to heart.
In addition, Pénoël had previously lectured in California in 1989 and 1990, showing audiences his “living embalming” technique. He saturated an ill woman’s tissues with repeated undiluted applications every 30 minutes. We saw him drip large amounts of oils on her back and use a hair dryer to dry them on her skin. Many of my colleagues were witness to this. Not long after this event, Gary Young started spreading a similar method called Raindrop Therapy, which he supposedly learned from a Lakota medicine man named Grandfather Wallace Black Elk. Black Elk’s children and tribe have since denied Young’s claim, and you can read a direct letter on that subject here.
The Influence of Multi-Level Marketing Companies
After Pénoël spoke at the Young Living convention and had his book published by the company (Pénoël, D. & R. – Natural Home Health Care Using Essential Oils. Editions Osmobiose, La Drome, France 1998), Young Living began using the idea of different “schools” within their marketing campaign. It makes perfect sense from a business perspective; telling people to perform undiluted medical treatments like this and oral use, too, sells more oil than diluted topical or atmospheric use. This was the beginning of the “schools” myth. Meanwhile, these marketing campaigns purport that the French method is superior to other, non-medically focused forms of aromatherapy.
And so began the use of undiluted oils on spines to correct scoliosis, along with daily oral use in capsules or water to treat many serious medical conditions. This is essentially the practice of medicinal aromatherapy by the masses, which I absolutely believe our beloved French aromatherapists never intended. Now all the other copycat companies repeat the same “joke,” making it appear real to newbies searching on the internet!
The German “school”
One aspect that especially confuses me is how Pénoël came up with the idea of the “German” school. Some sites say it’s because Germans find inhaling essential oils similar to walking in a forest with streams and brooks. But I think we all enjoy that, no? Why would this be relegated to a German school of thought?
It’s all very confusing and unclear, in my opinion. After all, at the Atlantic Institute of Aromatherapy, I teach topical use, oral use, and inhalation, and I am not French, German, or British. I’m a USA born-and-bred southern gal! I’ve also benefited from training all over the world with French, German, British, Australian, and American aromatherapists, leaders, and experts.
The Truth Behind the Myth
Someone recently asked me which school I subscribe to, and my answer was this: None of them! I teach and use essential oils and other natural products internally, externally, and environmentally.
I will use essential oils and natural products internally if I’m ill, but not on a daily basis because there is no need and they contain no nutrients. When using oils topically, I dilute them because it’s safer, more economically effective, and it covers a wider area. I apply essential oils daily in creams and lotions, and I inhale them daily in my environment; I’ll also inhale them from a diffuser if I’m congested. Most importantly, I don’t subscribe to any one school, because I subscribe to all of the schools. All of the so-called schools, together, make up aromatherapy. No matter the particular method of aromatherapy, it’s important to be well-trained in the safe use of essential oils.
Mostly, I’m baffled by this school myth because it attempts to rewrite aromatherapy history in the United States—and I was there for much of that history, starting in the 1970s. I saw aromatherapy come to America via herbalists; we’ve had companies here since the ’70s. I’ve worked with scientists and industry leaders like Martin Watt (UK), Dr. Trevor Stokes (Australian), Robert Pappas (Greek/American), Tony Burfield (UK) and Michael Kirk-Smith (Ireland)—to name just a few. I was part of the Purdue Initiative that ultimately led to the formation of the ARC (Aromatherapy Registration Council) exam. See some stories from this time on my Vintage Aromatherapist Blog.
Recounting my experiences
For 40 years, I’ve actively been studying essential oils and essential oil safety. I’ve been involved in the industry since early 1980, long before the idea of these schools ever took root. I will not allow aromatherapy history in the USA to be rewritten. As long as I’m alive, I will recount my true experiences with it.
So please trust me. You’re better off focusing on all aspects of aromatherapy and learning how to use each one safely and effectively. Don’t worry so much about the schools! And help stop this myth from taking over our history.
Learn more HERE.
Dedicated to those who tried to make the joke truth.
We can’t help but say the joke is on you.